<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>the darkerside to rants &#187; Adox</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thedarkerside.to/rants/tag/adox/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thedarkerside.to/rants</link>
	<description>It&#039;s a rant, I wrote it because it bugged me.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 09:01:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>50 year old camera and Film</title>
		<link>http://thedarkerside.to/rants/2009/04/05/50-year-old-camera-and-film/</link>
		<comments>http://thedarkerside.to/rants/2009/04/05/50-year-old-camera-and-film/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Apr 2009 19:56:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Musings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Photos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Adox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Adox Art 100]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Black & White]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fuji]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fuji Neopan-400  400 ASA (02302406)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HC 110]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jim Pick]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Photography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vintage Photography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zeiss]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zeiss Ikon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zeiss Ikon 532/16]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thedarkerside.to/rants/?p=1732</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Okay, the film is actually not 50 years old, but the formula that was used to make the film is. I found myself happily surprised by the result. I noticed after the first roll that the Tessar lens does sometimes something amazing to the film (and sometimes not so great, the Fuji Neopan 400 I [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><center> <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/darkness/3413069931/" title="Alexandra Park by thedarkerside.to, on Flickr"><img src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3645/3413069931_e616aec4af.jpg" width="500" height="481" alt="Alexandra Park" /></a></center></p>
<p>Okay, the film is actually not 50 years old, but the formula that was used to make the film is.</p>
<p>I found myself happily surprised by the result. I noticed after the first roll that the Tessar lens does sometimes something amazing to the film (and sometimes not so great, the Fuji Neopan 400 I thought looked rather crappy with the lens). But the Adox one really makes the Zeiss sing. It <b>looks</b> right. Here&#8217;s another portrait shot of <a href="http://jimpick.com/">Jim</a> that shows this nicely as well.</p>
<p><center><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/darkness/3413041651/" title="Jim Pick by thedarkerside.to, on Flickr"><img src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3301/3413041651_d583b14660.jpg" width="500" height="488" alt="Jim Pick" /></a></center></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://thedarkerside.to/rants/2009/04/05/50-year-old-camera-and-film/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

