It’s a rant, I wrote it because it bugged me.

Recovered from a cracking attempt on the site. Looks like there were some remnants from an old Gallery2 install on the server that they used.

They didn’t succeed in getting in, but they did succeed in completely hosing the WordPress installs.

Well, now it’s back, though still needs cleanup etc. Please pardon the dust.

This content is published under the Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported license.

This content is published under the Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported license.

Ah, back in the ’70s when computers still were new.

This content is published under the Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported license.

A little story made the rounds on the Internet recently which seems to imply that come Mac OS 10.7 only applications that have been approved by Apple and distributed through their app store (for OS X) would be allowed to run on the computer, so no more downloading shady software from parts of the Internet just because you want. Apple won’t let you.

As it goes with stories like these the moment it “broke” the slagging started with people on the one side saying “Evil Apple” while others were more relaxed and essentially said: “Apple would never do that”, and a few even thought of this as a good idea.

So what are the odds that Apple would do something like this? From Apple’s perspective this actually makes sense, they are already controlling the iPhone and iPod environment via the app store. Sure, you can jailbreak your iPhone and then use any kind of app on it that you want, even install a completely new OS on it, but for the majority of people what Apple approves is what they will eat.

But iPhones and iPods (and iPads now) are one thing, a Computer is something else, aren’t we all just deeply excited to write our own programs, fiddle with code and have full control over every minute part of the computer? If you say yes you fall probably in the 1% of the population that actually does this. The rest will still be shaking their heads right now.

Still though, people aren’t quite used to the idea that they have to go through their Computer vendor to get software, but if Apple would want to do this, how would they go about it?

Firstly, they have already trained a lot of people to accept the app store as the arbiter of software to find. In turn for many smaller developer it has turned into a successful distribution method, so why not expand it?

Secondly, Apple could open an Appstore for OS X, once it is open they could make it “difficult” for apps that haven’t come from the App store by simply making it annoying. Right now if you download an application from the net and start it up for the first time OS X warns you that this application was downloaded from the Internet on a given date and that OS X isn’t sure you should really run this. Now imagine they would do this everytime you start an app, added with a note that trusted applications can be found in the app store?

Three, once people are used of using the appstore to find their apps instead of the internet, force them to go there. The majority won’t care as they are already used to it anyway and the few geeks that will be pissed off can be ignored.

So what about the public backlash if Apple would be doing this? I predict slim to none. The people who care about open systems are a minority. The average computer user “eats” what he is given, they don’t scour the internet for applications or try to custom build their own. If Apple shows them a big enough carrot in the form of the appstore combined with some nice fear mongering with regard to the dangers of the internet they can get people to buy into it.

Will they do it? Who knows, Steve Jobs maybe. But if you look at the way Apple has been developing it’s products it just seems to make some kind of sense. There was a huge outcry when the iPod came with unexchangable batteries, there was a huge outcry when Apple insisted on only letting applications on the iPhone that came via the appstore and again when they did the battery thing with the new Laptops (me being one of the by the way). Has it hurt Apple? Not in the least, they are selling more devices than they ever have before and they will continue to do so.

The one thing all the Gees and Free Software advocates forget is something very simple: Most people already treat their computers like appliances, if Apple can give them that feeling on the computer while still letting them do what they want they will like it.

This content is published under the Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported license.

Every year people meet at the Vancouver Art Gallery and start smoking up to celebrate Pot and all it means to them.

Of course I was there this year, you can find a photo gallery on Flickr.

Or you can watch a slideshow I set up below the fold (on a variety of different hosting platforms).

This, btw, is my favourite shot I took:

Now, light up and enjoy the show:

Of course you can download the file directly to your computer form blip.tv

This content is published under the Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported license.

Cool little lego stop motion animation. Reminds me on how I used a Super8 camera back when I was a kid…. Ah, to try stop motion again…..

This content is published under the Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported license.

Around 18 months ago I tried cigars for the first time and found them to my liking. Back in December I got a pipe and enjoy that too. On Thursday I tried a hookah.

Now thanks to the stupid smoking laws in Vancouver you cannot smoke them with tobacco anymore, merely with some “herbs”, and no, not the fun one either.

So what is my take on it? Interesting experience, probably healthier than pounding down a few pints and clearly more relaxed, but I am not sure that really makes it worthwhile. A “session” costs $15, each tea a buck and they aren’t licensed, so no beer with your water pipe.

Still though, it has made it interesting enough for me to consider buying one of my own and then use it with tobacco.

Anybody here got one? Opinions? Ideas?

This content is published under the Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported license.

It has come up in discussions with others in the past and the one thing that pretty clear to me is that most people are not able to comprehend a “sudden” collapse in the Earth’s biosphere.

It shouldn’t really be too surprising, we do exist as part of something bigger but we usually do not realize the complexity that goes on around us, we’re not “made to see” these kinds of things and when it comes to timescales things get even more wobbly.

100 years in human time is a long long time. In the age of the Earth it is less than a blink of the eye, so talking of “sudden collapse” strikes most people as odd because it can still take a hundred years.

Still, there are no lifeboats for us to “abandon ship” on, so maybe we need to understand this, or have future generations live with the consequences.

This content is published under the Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported license.

Wow….

The famous racing yacht Atlantic. Designed by William Gardner for Wilson Marshall and built in 1903 by the Townsend & Downey shipyard, this steel-hulled, three-masted schooner had a deck length of 187 feet. In 1905 she won the “Kaiser Wilhelm Cup” in a Transatlantic race from Sandy Hook, New York to The Lizard, Cornwall, with a time of 12 days, 4 hours and 1 minute, a mono-hull record that stood for 100 years. She served the war effort from 1941 to 1947 as a US Coast Guard training vessel, and was broken up at Newport Harbor, Virginia in 1982.

More info. Larger Image.

This content is published under the Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported license.

Like the song, not so sure about the video (yet), may need to watch again.

This content is published under the Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported license.